Prove the risk is going down.
Ticket counts are not risk metrics
CRITICAL ASSUMPTION
MEASUREMENT BIAS
VALIDATION GAP
Know whether your vulnerability program is actually improving.
Is our risk going down?
Are we fixing faster?
Are vulnerabilities actually fixed?
A closed ticket isn't proof. Verified remediation is.
FINDING PRIORITIZED
OWNER ASSIGNED
REMEDIATION COMPLETED
SECURITY DATA REFRESHED
REMEDIATION VERIFIED
One source of truth. The view each stakeholder needs
Is our exposure actually going down?

Where is remediation working, and where is it stuck?

Can we prove what was done?

Build the right view
Filter & compare
Export and connect
Keep the proof behind every remediation outcome
Measure what changed. Let AI help you act on it.
Reporting in practice.
What is the difference between MTTR and risk reduction in Hackuity?
MTTR measures remediation speed. Risk reduction measures whether that remediation is actually reducing exposure. Hackuity uses both to provide a more complete view of vulnerability program performance.
Can I create custom dashboards for specific stakeholders?
Yes. Reporting views can be adapted to different operational and governance needs.
Can I compare remediation performance across teams or business units?
Hackuity can be used to analyze remediation performance across defined scopes and organizational perimeters.
How does Hackuity verify that a vulnerability is actually fixed?
Once a remediation is marked complete, Hackuity waits for updated scanner data and checks whether the vulnerability is still detected. If the finding is no longer present, the remediation is marked as verified. If it is still detected, the finding remains open or can be reopened according to the configured workflow.
Can reports be exported or connected to external BI tools?
Hackuity supports reporting exports and integrations according to the available connectors and API capabilities. Contact us to confirm the options available for your environment.




