Stop drowning in CVSS scores.
Start fixing what actually matters.
CVSS was never designed for prioritization
~50% of CVEs are rated High or Critical
Context is invisible to CVSS
Threat landscape changes daily
One score. Three dimensions of risk.
Vulnerability Score
Four risk levels. Clear remediation priorities.












A universal score. No context needed.
CVE-Pedia
Universal benchmark
API-accessible
The data engine powering TRS.
Your context changes the score. Automatically.
You know what to fix. Now, who fixes it, and how fast?
THE PROBLEM RAW DATA ALONE CAN'T SOLVE
TRS: how it works in practice.
Why is TRS multiplicative, not additive?
Additive models tend to skew and distort priorities by stacking minor issues. Multiplicative algorithms isolate distinct risk indicators, ensuring high context weights are required to trigger Critical score alerts.
Can we override TRS for our specific context?
Yes. Playbooks let you modify any asset or finding attribute CIA requirements, exposure level, CVSS environmental vector, protection level and TRS recalculates automatically. Your context always takes precedence.
Is TRS different from CVSS?
Yes, fundamentally. CVSS measures technical severity independently of your environment and the real threat landscape. TRS multiplies vulnerability severity by live threat intelligence and your specific asset context.
A CVSS 10 on an air-gapped, non-critical system will have a much lower TRS than a CVSS 7 on an internet-facing production server actively targeted by threat actors.
Does Hackuity deduplicate non-CVE findings like misconfigurations?
Hackuity provides CVSS Base severity for non-CVE findings via VulnDB. The TRS formula is identical regardless of finding type only the input values differ. CVE or not, the score is calculated and comparable.




