Case Study
November 20, 2025
10 min

Nearly Half of Security Teams Struggling to Cope with Growing Volume of Vulnerabilities

Hackuity, the risk-based vulnerability management provider, today released new research revealing the mounting pressure on security teams as they struggle to keep pace with the rising number of CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures).
Code Red Communications for Hackuity
Chief Security Officer, Hackuity
Article
On this article
Topic part 1

LYON, November 20th – Hackuity, the risk-based vulnerability management provider, today released new research revealing the mounting pressure on security teams as they struggle to keep pace with the rising number of CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures).

The Vulnerability Management Report explores the challenges of vulnerability management and includes insights from 200 IT security decision-makers across the UK and APAC.

As the number of CVEs continues to rise, nearly half (46%) of respondents say that the volume has placed additional strain on their security teams’ resources impacting not only organisational security but also staff wellbeing.

One in four, 26%, admit this pressure has contributed to a data breach, while more than a third, 36%, report it resulted in a regulatory fine. Over a third (36%) also say it has delayed incident response, and 33% report missed security alerts as a result. In terms of the human impact, 38% report that it has led to burnout within the team.

Commenting on the findings, Sylvain Cortes VP Strategy at Hackuity said: “We know that teams are feeling the pressure right now - but what’s most concerning is the knock-on effect this is having on organisations and on the team’s well-being. From missed alerts to fines, there are real consequences at play when vulnerabilities aren’t managed in a way that’s making the best use of team’s time and expertise. The nonstop flood of alerts isn’t just stressful, it’s costly.

”The ability to process and manage vulnerabilities has become ever more critical. Whilst most organisations, 77%, report that they have formalised vulnerability remediation processes in place for identifying vulnerabilities, only 36% have a risk-based approach as the primary method, where vulnerabilities are based on asset criticality‚ exploitability and business impact.

It also seems that there is more work to do in moving vulnerability management (VM) higher up the agenda as 60% of respondents reported that it does not receive the same focus as other IT security projects.

Additional key findings from the report include:

  • Critical Vulnerabilities take on average four weeks to remediate: The mean time to remediation (MTTR) for critical vulnerabilities is four weeks, on average. However, one in five organisations (21%) report that it can take between one and three months to remediate critical vulnerabilities.
  • The barriers to VM: operational and budget constraints: Although respondents recognise the strain of vulnerability management, they are hindered by operational (43%) and budget (41%) constraints. The issue of staff and skills shortages also play apart with 29% of respondents citing lack of skills within the team and a quarter reporting that high staff turnover prevents them from making improvement to VM practices.

Sylvain Cortes continues: “Security leaders need to look at how they’re equipping their teams to make sure they can keep pace with the rising volume and complexity of vulnerabilities. Without context and intelligence around the alerts, they risk wasting valuable time and resources chasing down threats or missing alerts that could pose the greatest risk for their organisation.

”Download a copy of the report at this link: Hackuity Vulnerability Management Research

Code Red Communications for Hackuity
Chief Security Officer, Hackuity
Sarah specializes in human-computer interaction and machine learning systems. Over the past decade, she has published over 30 papers on cognitive load optimization and next-generation interface models.
Ready to see Hackuity in action?
See how Hackuity maps to your tools, teams, and remediation workflows.
Book a demo
Share this post
VR-1
Property
Model type

Post-trained cyber reasoning model

Primary specialization

Multi-domain enterprise attack-chain discovery

Starting condition

A scoped foothold and a concrete objective

Operating surfaces

Cloud, identity, runtime, code, CI/CD, SaaS, and organizational context
xxxxxx

Success signal

Execution-verified completion of the objective

Primary evaluation

IntrusionBench

Preliminary result (preview)

More than 2× black-box pass@3 over the strongest evaluated frontier baseline

Trajectory budget

Two-hour wall-clock limit per trajectory, or 250 agent turns (whichever comes first)

Most recent articals

Hackuity in the News
Article
5 minutes
Hackuity raises $19M Series B to scale the AI-powered Vulnerability Operations Center
Today we announced $19 million in new funding, bringing Hackuity's total funding to $38 million. The round was led by Forgepoint Capital International, alongside our existing investors Bright Pixel, Bpifrance and Seventure Partners.
Patrick RAGARU
Co-founder & CEO
Pierre SAMSON
Co-Founder and Chief Revenue Officer
September 15, 2026
Expert View
Article
5 minutes
All about CTEM in 5 minutes
Security teams do not suffer from a lack of vulnerability data, they suffer from too much of it. What they need is a clear way to prioritize and act on it.
Pierre SAMSON
Co-Founder and Chief Revenue Officer
September 9, 2026
Expert View
8 minutes
MTTR & MTO: The Metrics Everyone Talks About, But Almost No One Calculates Correctly
The KPI Your Clients Always Ask First: No matter the industry, no matter the maturity of the organization: when a CISO or security leader reviews their vulnerability management.
Thomas CHARARA
Product Manager
August 25, 2026

See Hackuity in action

Schedule a personalized demo to see how Hackuity maps to your environment.
Illustration of hackuity presention, Screenshot of the Hackuity Exposure Overview dashboard showing 1 critical, 474 high, and 2.6k other open findings, alongside a 12-month bar chart of findings by severity and a video call panel