Blog

The vulnerability management ‘to do’ list can feel like a perpetual loop. No sooner have the latest batch of security updates been handled than it’s time to start over again.

‍Hackuity, the risk-based vulnerability management provider, today announced the launch of Version 2.0 of its next generation platform, featuring major enhancements to bring further support to organisations in prioritising risks.

You've got better severity scores. You've got risk context. Now you need to actually decide what to do. This is the final piece of the puzzle. In our first article, we covered how CVSS v4 improved severity measurement. In the second, we explored how TRS adds threat and environmental context to calculate actual risk. But even with accurate severity and comprehensive risk scoring, most vulnerability management programs stall at the same point: turning data into consistent decisions. Your team knows which vulnerabilities are risky. But how do you consistently decide what gets fixed this week versus next month? How do you explain those choices when engineering teams push back? SSVC (Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization) solves this. It turns your risk signals into defensible, repeatable decisions.

I see many organizations fall into the “patch everything now” trap, treating any delay as a ticking time bomb. Ironically, this constant sense of urgency can make for a less efficient patch management process. Chasing every CVE as...

The EU-led framework will reduce reliance on US-based MITRE vulnerability reporting database.Cybersecurity experts have welcomed the launch of the new Global CVE Allocation System (GCVE) as a positive move toward more robust vulnerability..

When CVSS v4 launched in November 2023, the security community had questions. Would organizations actually adopt it? Would the refined scoring methodology deliver on its promises? And most importantly, would it help security teams make better decisions? Two years in, we finally have answers. And they're not what everyone expected.